Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Michelin Primacy 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 2 road tests and 5,823 + 196 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
± 4

Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,823 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Hi I am having a set of these fitted tomorrow. They are the same sizes as yours. The total cost will be £366 including fitting and balancing. I am using a Formula One Autocentre. I don't know if there is one in your area but it would be worth having a look. Hope this helps.”

Michelin Primacy 3
Tire BMichelin

Primacy 3

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 66 · 196 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 20 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I have just put a new set of Michelin Primacy 3 T0 Acoustics on and they have been faultless. Lots of grip, very quiet etc. They were also good last year in the snow and were from blackcircles for about £240 a tyre.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests7574
    Reviews found online7270
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%99%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.7 = 74

    Primacy 3: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 72

  2. 79

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests8072
    Reviews found online7772
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–095%92%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%97%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 76.5 = 79

    Primacy 3: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 72

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7367

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72

    Primacy 3: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Primacy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online76–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.2 = 69

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7073
    Reviews found online6657
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–172%83%

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68

    Primacy 3: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 57 = 67

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Reviews found online7468
  8. 75

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests75–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Michelin Primacy 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3Michelin Primacy 3
Relative Score 74 70
Dry 74 72
Wet 79 72
Snow 59 –
Comfort 72 68
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 68 67
Handling (owners) 74 68
Efficiency 75 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

± 6

Primacy 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 5 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 finished ahead 5 times and Michelin Primacy 3 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 3Primacy 3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% 99% −0.7 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18
Wet Braking Wet 95% 92% +2.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18
Wet Handling Wet 100% 97% +2.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18
Wear Treadwear 72% 83% −11.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/11 #9/11 – 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2018 Ace 235/45 R18 Summer Tyre Test · 235/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
  • Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
  • Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 review

Tire B Primacy 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Strong dry grip and confident handling
  • Smooth, refined high-speed stability and cruising capability

Cons

  • Higher than average purchase price
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by many users
  • Mixed feedback on wet weather performance, with some noting a lack of grip in standing water or snow
All owner themes in the Primacy 3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Mixed

Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-05-28

“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“Hi, I currently have Falken Azenis FK510s all round and i need to replace both front tyres. Sticking with Runflats, are these a good option: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (225/40 R19 93Y) ROF XL *BMW [F] and is there any downsides to running 2 different brands? The back don't need changing yet car is a 335d xDrive Thanks for any info”

forums.mbclub.co.uk ·2018-08-22

“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”

Top themes
#replacing run-flat tires#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#pricing and deals#staggered fitment sizing#tread wear longevity

Based on 32 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Primacy 3

Mixed

Community members generally view the Michelin Primacy 3 as a quiet, smooth, and capable grand touring tire, with several users highlighting the run-flat (ZP) version as superior in comfort to competing run-flats. However, some drivers report fast tread wear, a harsh ride compared to standard non-run-flat alternatives, and note that the model is older and increasingly replaced by newer generations like the Primacy 4.

r/LexusES ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“By far the biggest determinant in road noise will be the road surface, as you found, and no tire will overcome that basic fact. That is so obvious in my area where there are new sections of highway interspersed with old sections. Having said that, I'm running the older Michelin Primacy 3 ST tires on 17 inch wheels on my 2021 ES300h and they are great, compared to the Turanza I was running on 19 inch wheels on the same car. The Michelin Primacy Tour A/S should be even better in this regard. Not sure, but perhaps the higher profile of the 17 inch tires (215/55R17 vs 235/40R19) also helps reduce road noise.”

mbworld.org

“Currently riding on Michelin Primacy 3 ZP run flats that originally came with the car. Have approximately 15k miles on it and Mercedes are already recommending I purchase new rear tires. What other options would you recommend as replacements? I would like all season tires that last much longer but also don't want to compromise the comfort and ride. Front tire: 245/40 R19 Rear tire: 275/35 R19”

teslamotorsclub.com ·2021-04-26

“I've got a similar issue with my rear-left having nearly 0.9 mm less central tread than the others, all at same pressure from cold. Suspect it's just due to the way sunlight falls on the car where I park it, warming up that corner over time just enough to raise its pressure before every trip. Either that or a quality issue with the manufacturer custom-made T0 from Michelin (Primacy 3 in my case).”

Top themes
#Run-flat ride quality#Tread wear and longevity#Touring comfort and low noise#Model obsolescence and replacements#OE fitment and regional availability#Price and size compatibility

Based on 23 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 B · Michelin Primacy 3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3942
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth7 - 11/32″—
UTQG240 - 300 AA A240 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max pressure42 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Michelin Primacy 3

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 79 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Tire B · Michelin Primacy 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Primacy 3?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Primacy 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Primacy 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Primacy 3?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 or Primacy 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology