Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 3,596 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 81 · 3,596 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests85–
    Reviews found online87–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 86.9 = 86

  2. 90

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests93–
    Reviews found online86–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 85.8 = 90

  3. 82

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests94–
    Reviews found online75–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 93.6 + 60% × 75.1 = 82

  4. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 79

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests83–
    Reviews found online72–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 79

  6. 85

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Reviews found online85–
  7. 61

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Excellence RunOnFlat
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests61–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat
Relative Score 84 –
Dry 86 –
Wet 90 –
Comfort 82 –
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 79 –
Handling (owners) 85 –
Efficiency 61 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Excellence RunOnFlat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

Tire B Excellence RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat
CategorySummerSummer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available64—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat

Only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology