Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 23 road tests and 3,596 + 13,381 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads, 84–81 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 81 · 3,596 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 77 · 13,381 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Well my answer is none of the above. You choose, they are all a lottery imo. I just bought some Michelin Primacy 4 for mine today. Size 215/55 R18”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 21 tests | 85 | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 77 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 98% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 86.9 = 86
Primacy 4: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 77.2 = 82
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 22 tests | 93 | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 80 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 75% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 92% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 93% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 97% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 85.8 = 90
Primacy 4: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 79.7 = 84
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 5 tests | 94 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 76 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 93.6 + 60% × 75.1 = 82
Primacy 4: 40% × 76.6 + 60% × 76.4 = 76
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 15 tests | 73 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 100% |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
Primacy 4: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests | 83 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 74 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 79
Primacy 4: 60% × 85 + 40% × 74.3 = 81
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 85 | 76 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 15 tests | 61 | 93 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 78% | 99% |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 81 |
| Dry | 86 | 82 |
| Wet | 90 | 84 |
| Comfort | 82 | 76 |
| Noise | 70 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 81 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 61 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Primacy 4
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 finished ahead 2 times and Michelin Primacy 4 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Primacy 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 100% | −2.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 98% | +0.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 63% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% | 75% | +25.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% | 92% | +7.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% | 100% | −6.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 92% #13/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 97% | +1.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 80% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 93% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 89% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 92% #4/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 100% | −1.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 100% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 60% #7/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 100% #1/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 87% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% | 99% | −20.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 64% | 55% | +8.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #1/20 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | #3/21 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 97% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 83% #8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 100% #1/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 98% #5/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 100% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 96% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 92% #4/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 88% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tyre Weight | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 | #4/6 | – | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 Quattroruote Summer Tire Test R17 · 225/50R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Based on 13 community posts
Community sentiment towards the Michelin Primacy 4 is generally positive, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfort, and dependable wet and dry braking performance. Several owners note impressive longevity reaching over 50,000 to 70,000 km, though some EV and SUV drivers report accelerated wear and fragile sidewalls over rough terrain. It is commonly viewed as a premium touring tire that commands high prices compared to competitors.
“Review: Michelin Primacy 4 ST I own a 2023 N8 DCT and recently changed all four tyres from the stock CEATs after one of the tyres’ sidewall was punctured on hitting a rather deep pothole at high speed. Cost: INR 9,750 per tyre Existing tyre buyback: INR 1,000 per tyre (~15k kms) Review: I’ve been using the new tyres for a few weeks now and I’m happy with the upgrade. The difference is noticeable, but only if you pay attention. I’d say a non-savvy person won’t notice anything different unless you ask them to pay attention. At low speeds, the road noise is reduced and the vehicle is noticeably silent (almost dead silent if the roads are smooth and the engine is at low revs) and smoother. At high speeds, the noise level difference is not very noticeable due to the engine and wind noise, but the smoothness and grip is noticeably better. That said, I wouldn’t say the stock tyres are bad (in terms of both - noise and grip) as a lot of reviewers like to point out; definitely not a night and day difference for me. Lastly, I believe the fuel efficiency has improved due to the lower rolling resistance, but I don’t have enough data to claim this confidently. My verdict is to only upgrade if your current tyres are worn out. Personally, I don’t think spending close to 40k is worth it for the budget conscious. But if you have the money to spare, you will definitely be happy with the upgrade. Read more”
“Yokohama es la que va pero fijate que ya este año salieron las nuevas advan v61, esas geolandar g058 son modelo viejo. Las primacy 4 son modelo viejo y te las cobran como si fuesen oro. Bridgestone y continental tambien las vi a precio de oro. Pirelli son medio pelo, no son malas pero son ruidosas, ya que estás en el baile podes ir por algo mejor, como las yokohama.”
“I'll have to remember to get some E's. That aside, the primacy 4 fitted to the mokka only have 6.5 mm, if that, from new so perhaps they were just an older name. Gaz”
Based on 44 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | 57 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 20 | 20 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Michelin Primacy 4
Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy 4 if efficiency matters most to you.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 93 vs 61 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 76 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 84 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 76 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 90 vs 84 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 86 vs 82 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 82 vs 76 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Michelin Primacy 4, 93 vs 61 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
