Yokohama Advan S.T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan S.T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 1,929 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–46

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
± 4

Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,929 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Yokohama Advan S.T
± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 94

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +46
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests96≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online9137

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.1 = 94

    Advan S.T: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 37 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 92

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +45
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests93≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online9238

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 92

    Advan S.T: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 38 = 47

    No road tests of wet for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–32

    Advan S.T: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 79

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +41
    38
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests76≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8123

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    Advan S.T: 40% × 59.5 (est.) + 60% × 23.1 = 38

    No road tests of comfort for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 82

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +28
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests93≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)36

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82

    Advan S.T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Advan S.T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 86

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +42
    44
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests96≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7030

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86

    Advan S.T: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 90

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +56
    34
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Reviews found online9034
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests71–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan S.T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Yokohama Advan S.T
Relative Score 90 46
Dry 94 48
Wet 92 47
Snow – 48
Comfort 79 38
Noise 82 54
Treadwear 86 44
Handling (owners) 90 34
Efficiency 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

± 8

Advan S.T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
  • Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

Tire B Advan S.T

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Relatively low noise levels reported by some users
  • Good grip in both dry and wet conditions for certain drivers

Cons

  • Extremely poor durability resulting in premature replacement and rapid tread wear
  • Structural defects including tire distortion and sidewall bulges within low mileage
  • High price point relative to the lifespan and quality provided
All owner themes in the Advan S.T review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.

Top themes
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan S.T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 B · Yokohama Advan S.T
CategorySummer—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available1301
Rim diameters17″ – 23″20″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″11/32″
UTQG260 - 300 AA A420 A B
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated BandOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Yokohama Advan S.T

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S.T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 92 vs 47 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 44 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire B · Yokohama Advan S.T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 47 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 38 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Advan S.T?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology