tirewheelguide

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 33 road tests and 7 + 21,726 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–59

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate 2 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,726 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +33
    95
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 64 (est.)99
    Reviews found online6088

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 59

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +28
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 62 (est.)83
    Reviews found online5492

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.7 = 87

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +32
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests≈ 64 (est.)99
    Reviews found online4978

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.2 = 90

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +22
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 65 (est.)67
    Reviews found online5186

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 50.9 = 57

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.2 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 65

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 66 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6283

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 79

    No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +29
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 60 (est.)81
    Reviews found online4888

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +30
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online5282
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests–90
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-SeasonMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 59 88
Dry 62 95
Wet 59 87
Snow 58 90
Comfort 57 79
Noise 65 79
Treadwear 55 84
Handling (owners) 52 82
Efficiency – 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

± 4

CrossClimate 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality with minimal road noise
  • Reliable traction on dry and wet surfaces
  • Competent performance in light snow and winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by certain users, especially on the shoulders
  • Shorter overall lifespan compared to some original equipment tire alternatives
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”
macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”
r/Ioniq5 ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-26

“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available192
Rim diameters20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG500 AA A640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology