Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 143 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 71, Advan Neova AD08 70.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7680

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7869

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 76

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6968

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6161

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +7
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7279
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 AsymmetricYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 71 70
Dry 73 75
Wet 76 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 69 68
Noise 68 67
Treadwear 63 63
Handling (owners) 72 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 AsymmetricAdvan Neova AD08ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/8 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction, inspiring high confidence in corners and heavy rain
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback near the limit
  • Noticeably improved ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to rivals like Pirelli and Bridgestone

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly under spirited driving
  • Poor performance and hazardous lack of grip in freezing temperatures, snow, or ice as a dedicated summer tire
  • Prone to increased road noise, cupping, or tramlining as the tread wears down past halfway
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11—
Rim diameters17″ – 20″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″9/32″
UTQG240 - 300 A - AA A180 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated BandBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is stronger on wet. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 76 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology