Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 143 reviews
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 143 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 71, Advan Neova AD08 70.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Advan Neova AD08 +275Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 76 80 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
76
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +769Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 78 69 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 76
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +168Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 67 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +167Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 68 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
Level63Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 61 61 Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +779Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 72 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 76 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Noise | 68 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/8 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction, inspiring high confidence in corners and heavy rain
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback near the limit
- Noticeably improved ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to rivals like Pirelli and Bridgestone
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly under spirited driving
- Poor performance and hazardous lack of grip in freezing temperatures, snow, or ice as a dedicated summer tire
- Prone to increased road noise, cupping, or tramlining as the tread wears down past halfway
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 A - AA A | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is stronger on wet. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 76 vs 69 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 72 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology