tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle LS vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 146 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Eagle LS Check price on Amazon · Eagle LS-2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle LS
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle LS

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online–47

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–54

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–47

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LSEagle LS-2
    Reviews found online–47
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle LSGoodyear Eagle LS-2
Relative Score – 56
Dry – 55
Wet – 58
Snow – 57
Comfort – 59
Noise – 62
Treadwear – 55
Handling (owners) – 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle LS

Eagle LS-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle LS

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle LS B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9 - 12/32″
UTQG—360 - 400 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle LS

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Only Goodyear Eagle LS-2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology