Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 13 road tests and 773 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 80–75

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
± 5

Tests 81 · 5 tests Owners 80 · 773 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +1
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 11 tests7784
    Reviews found online8273
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–097%97%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 82.1 = 79

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80

  2. 81

    Wet

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +3
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 12 tests8281
    Reviews found online7975
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%90%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%98%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 79.4 = 81

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78

  3. 78

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests8070
    Reviews found online7668

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 40% × 80.3 + 60% × 76.4 = 78

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69

  4. 83

    Noise

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +22
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests9458
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%96%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 81

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests8278
    Reviews found online8067

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 79.9 = 81

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

  6. 76

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Reviews found online7672
  7. 75

    Efficiency

    Ventus Prime 4 +8
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 8 tests7583
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–187%97%
Scores at a glance
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUVHankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 80 75
Dry 79 80
Wet 81 78
Comfort 78 69
Noise 83 61
Treadwear 81 74
Handling (owners) 76 72
Efficiency 75 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip 2 SUVVentus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% 98% −2.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Dry Handling Dry 97% 97% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% 90% +4.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Wet Braking Wet 96% 95% +0.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 98% −0.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Noise Noise 100% 96% +4.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% 97% −9.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 49% 62% −12.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Dirt Handling Off-road 99% 100% −0.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Grass Traction Off-road 86% 83% +2.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Mud Traction Off-road 90% 86% +3.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Sand Traction Off-road 91% 94% −2.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #4/12 #5/12 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can compromise responsive handling and cornering feedback
  • Less effective performance in cold, freezing, or damp winter conditions
  • Lack of built-in rim protection
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip 2 SUV review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”

forums.hardwarezone.com.sg ·2024-11-12

“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available4166
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 83 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 78 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 75 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 81 vs 74 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 78 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 83 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 78 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 74 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 83 vs 75 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology