Tests 81 · 5 tests Owners 80 · 773 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 13 road tests and 773 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score
EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 80–75
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 5 tests Owners 80 · 773 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 11 tests | 77 | 84 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 73 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 97% | 97% |
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 82.1 = 79
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 12 tests | 82 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 75 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 94% | 90% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 98% | 98% |
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 79.4 = 81
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests | 80 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 68 |
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 40% × 80.3 + 60% × 76.4 = 78
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests | 94 | 58 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests | 82 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 67 |
EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 79.9 = 81
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 76 | 72 |
| Source | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 8 tests | 75 | 83 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 87% | 97% |
| Category | Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 75 |
| Dry | 79 | 80 |
| Wet | 81 | 78 |
| Comfort | 78 | 69 |
| Noise | 83 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 75 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Ventus Prime 4
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | EfficientGrip 2 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 98% | −2.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% | 97% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #4/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 90% | +4.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% | 95% | +0.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 98% | −0.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% | 96% | +4.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 100% #1/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 77% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% | 97% | −9.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 49% | 62% | −12.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #1/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | #4/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 92% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 64% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dirt Handling | Off-road | 99% | 100% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 86% | 83% | +2.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 90% | 86% | +3.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 91% | 94% | −2.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/12 | #5/12 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested · 225/65 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Based on 41 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 41 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if efficiency matters most to you.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 83 vs 61 on noise.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 78 vs 69 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 75 on efficiency.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 81 vs 74 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 78 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 83 vs 61 on our noise score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 78 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 74 on our treadwear score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 83 vs 75 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology