Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 1 + 3,596 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 81 · 3,596 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    86
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests–85
    Reviews found online–87

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 86.9 = 86

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests–93
    Reviews found online–86

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 85.8 = 90

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    82
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–94
    Reviews found online–75

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 93.6 + 60% × 75.1 = 82

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests–73
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–83
    Reviews found online–72

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 79

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    85
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Reviews found online–85
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceExcellence RunOnFlatEagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–61
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Excellence RunOnFlatGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Relative Score – 84
Dry – 86
Wet – 90
Comfort – 82
Noise – 70
Treadwear – 79
Handling (owners) – 85
Efficiency – 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Excellence RunOnFlat

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Excellence RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG—300 - 500 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology