Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Excellence vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 128 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 73–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 9

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5377

    Excellence: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 58

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Excellence. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +15
    76
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online5778

    Excellence: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Excellence. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5471

    Excellence: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Excellence or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–79

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)58
    Reviews found online5376

    Excellence: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Excellence. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceExcellenceCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online5474
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Excellence vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear ExcellenceKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 59 73
Dry 58 74
Wet 61 76
Snow – 70
Comfort 59 70
Noise – 72
Treadwear 58 65
Handling (owners) 54 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Excellence

± 9

Crugen HT51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Excellence

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth handling on long journeys
  • Low road noise levels, providing a quiet cabin experience
  • Strong dry traction and predictable handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, leading to short overall tire lifespan
  • Noticeable degradation in wet weather grip and increased susceptibility to aquaplaning as the tread wears down
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to bulging, blistering, or pothole damage
All owner themes in the Excellence review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Excellence B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available1544
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″12.5/32″
UTQG240 A A720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Excellence

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Excellence
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Excellence or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Excellence or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Excellence or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Excellence or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Excellence or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology