Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 20 reviews
Goodyear GT3 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 71–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
48
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +2270Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 38 71 GT3: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.7 = 48
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for GT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +2374Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 44 75 GT3: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 44.1 = 51
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for GT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – GT3: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 55
No road tests of snow for GT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +2873Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 34 75 GT3: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.6 = 45
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
51
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +1465Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 41 65 GT3: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 51
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for GT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
39
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +3675Why this score
Source GT3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 39 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear GT3 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 71 |
| Dry | 48 | 70 |
| Wet | 51 | 74 |
| Snow | 55 | – |
| Comfort | 45 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 39 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
GT3
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A GT3
Pros
- Acceptable dry-road grip and stability
- Reasonable comfort levels when new
- Competitive pricing in certain markets
Cons
- Poor traction and safety concerns on wet surfaces
- High levels of road noise that increase with tread wear
- Short tread life and premature wear, particularly on front-wheel-drive vehicles
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear GT3 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear GT3
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 39 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 45 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 51 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 48 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, GT3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 51 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology