Tests – · none yet Owners 36 · 13 reviews
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 13 + 30 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Alpin 5 is ahead, 87–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 90 · 18 tests Owners 82 · 30 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
47
Dry
Pilot Alpin 5 +4188Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 54 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 35 84 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 47
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 91.1 + 40% × 83.7 = 88
No road tests of dry for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
50
Wet
Pilot Alpin 5 +4191Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 42 86 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 50
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 93.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 91
No road tests of wet for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
42
Snow
Pilot Alpin 5 +4587Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 24 78 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 42
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 77.7 = 87
No road tests of snow for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
51
Comfort
Pilot Alpin 5 +2778Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 43 77 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.8 = 51
Pilot Alpin 5: 40% × 79.5 + 60% × 76.8 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
Pilot Alpin 5 +2785Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 97 Reviews found online 44 ≈ 67 (est.) Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 58
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 85
No road tests of noise for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
47
Treadwear
Pilot Alpin 5 +3784Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 35 82 Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.9 = 47
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 82.3 = 84
No road tests of treadwear for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Pilot Alpin 5 +4385Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Reviews found online 42 85 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Ultra Grip Performance 2 Pilot Alpin 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 87 |
| Dry | 47 | 88 |
| Wet | 50 | 91 |
| Snow | 42 | 87 |
| Comfort | 51 | 78 |
| Noise | 58 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 84 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 85 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ultra Grip Performance 2
Pilot Alpin 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ultra Grip Performance 2 | Pilot Alpin 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/12 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | #2/18 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultra Grip Performance 2
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on dry and wet tarmac
- Agile handling and reliable grip in wet conditions and light-to-medium snow
- Good directional tread design for effective water and slush evacuation
Cons
- Severely lacking traction and grip on packed snow and ice according to dissatisfied users
- Triggers frequent ABS activation and wheel spin during acceleration and braking in wintry precipitation
- Vague handling feel on tarmac for certain drivers
Tire B Pilot Alpin 5
Pros
- Outstanding dry and wet grip and handling, feeling similar to a UHP summer tire
- Great snow traction and stability for mountain driving and aggressive winter cornering
- Excellent steering response and high feedback compared to traditional winter tires
Cons
- Subpar performance and braking on pure ice or severe slush
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a firmer, sometimes bumpy ride quality and transfer road imperfections
- Fuel economy can be negatively impacted
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 81 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 17″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 87 vs 42 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 85 vs 42 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 88 vs 47 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 91 vs 50 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Which is better in the wet, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 91 vs 50 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 88 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 87 vs 42 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 85 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 78 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ultra Grip Performance 2 or Pilot Alpin 5?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 84 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology