tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Crugen HP71

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 275 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro AS RH03 is ahead, 57–52

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Dynapro AS RH03 +8
    48
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4937

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Dynapro AS RH03 +2
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5349

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4548

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Dynapro AS RH03 +5
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4840

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Dynapro AS RH03 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5144

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Dynapro AS RH03 +16
    44
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online5629

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP71 +6
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online4955
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro AS RH03Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 57 52
Dry 56 48
Wet 57 55
Snow 55 57
Comfort 59 54
Noise 61 58
Treadwear 60 44
Handling (owners) 49 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro AS RH03

Crugen HP71

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-03-02

“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho​ Crugen HP71​ 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW​”
r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 51 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—63
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth14/32″9.9/32″
UTQG—640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if handling matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 60 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 56 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 55 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 59 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 55 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 56 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 57 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 61 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 59 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 60 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology