Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT M vs General Grabber AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 86 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison66Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 Grabber AT2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
–
Wet
No comparison63Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Grabber AT2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison71Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison69Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 70 Grabber AT2: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison73Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison62Why this score
Source Dynapro AT M Grabber AT2 Reviews found online – 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT M | General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 67 |
| Dry | – | 66 |
| Wet | – | 63 |
| Snow | – | 71 |
| Comfort | – | 69 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | – | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Dynapro AT M
67
/ 100
Grabber AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT M
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT M | B · General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 27 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | — | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT M
67
/ 100
General Grabber AT2
Only General Grabber AT2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT M
Tire B · General Grabber AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology