Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 19 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 19 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 72–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 63 · 19 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 186 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 77 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 76 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 59 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 64
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2 (RF11). The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 75 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.7 = 59
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 73 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 69
No road tests of noise for Dynapro AT2 (RF11) or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 78 |
Dynapro AT2 (RF11): 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.7 = 70
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | – | 70 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 72 |
| Dry | 65 | 74 |
| Wet | 65 | 74 |
| Snow | 63 | 64 |
| Comfort | 59 | 73 |
| Noise | 66 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/18 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11)
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AT2 (RF11) rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 59 on comfort.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 69 vs 66 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology