tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 218 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro AT2 leads, 56–53 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire BLaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

± 8

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Dynapro AT2 +6
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)49
    Reviews found online5154

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.9 + 40% × 53.9 = 51

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Dynapro AT2 +10
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)46
    Reviews found online5454

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59

    S fit EQ: 60% × 46 + 40% × 53.8 = 49

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    S fit EQ +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4654

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53

    S fit EQ: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–49
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    S fit EQ +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)64
    Reviews found online4856

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55

    S fit EQ: 60% × 64 + 40% × 55.7 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro AT2 +1
    47
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Reviews found online4847
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT2Laufenn S fit EQ
Relative Score 56 53
Dry 57 51
Wet 59 49
Snow 61 –
Comfort 53 59
Noise – 56
Treadwear 55 61
Handling (owners) 48 47
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro AT2

± 8

S fit EQ

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

Tire B S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.

f150gen14.com ·1 upvote ·2025-10-22

“The factory Hankook AT2s have lasted between 24,000 to 36,000 miles on my current and previous trucks. I have always been happy with the AT2s but last time I went with the Hankook AT2 Xtreme and I am very happy with them. The tires weigh a little bit more than AT2 but no changes to MPG worth noting and ride is very similar. They are slightly louder but not a big deal in my opinion. The AT2 Xtreme seem like they will last much longer because the tread is not wearing as much as the AT2s did. I am getting ready to order a 2026 F150 Platinum and I already told the dealer GM, that they will be swapping out the factory tires with AT2 Xtremes and he had no problems with that... I wish I would have done that on previous F150s that I have ordered! I forgot to mention my worst experience with factory tires was an 2012 F150 BAP that had Pirelli scorpion tires and only lasted 18,000 miles. That was very disappointing!”
r/AskAMechanic ·1 upvote ·2026-08-08

“It is too damaged to keep using and or is it able to be repaired? Hello, just saw this on my tire a bit ago, thought it was a rock and pulled it out. Its a small metal piece. My question is if the the metal pierced too far in and damaged the tire to where its unsafe to use anymore. If so, is it able to be repaired? These tires are 2 months old. Hankook Dynapros at2 xtreme. Posted this on r/tires and most said it was completely fine. Thanks”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-05-26

“I've loved mine on a 2024 Subaru Outback Wilderness. I came from Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S which I loved but that found one too many nails. No issues after 30,000 miles on the Hankooks. I had some Dynapro MT's back on a FJ Cruiser which I loved so that's why I decided to try them again. Just in case someone with an Outback or someone looking at these sizes, here's some data I had compiled. 235/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.1”, Section Width 9.6”, Tread Width 7.5” , Weight 32 lbs 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.6”, Section Width 10”, Tread Width 7.9” , Weight 35 lbs”
Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades

Based on 56 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn S fit EQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 B · Laufenn S fit EQ
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3324
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Laufenn S fit EQ

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro AT2 — better wet and dry. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 59 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 57 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn S fit EQ scores 59 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S fit EQ scores 61 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ?

Hankook Dynapro AT2, 59 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ?

Hankook Dynapro AT2, 57 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ?

Laufenn S fit EQ, 59 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 or S fit EQ?

Laufenn S fit EQ, 61 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology