Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 218 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar H/T G056 is ahead, 67–56
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 73 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 70 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 50 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 69 |
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.8 = 52
Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 72 |
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 63 |
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 47 | 68 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 67 |
| Dry | 56 | 71 |
| Wet | 58 | 70 |
| Snow | 61 | 58 |
| Comfort | 52 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro AT2
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
“Factory tires are usually worse than what you normally purchase at a tire shop. Have seen it with every new vehicle. (I get a new work vehicle every 3-4 years) If you look up those Dynapro AT2s, you'll see they even have a different tread pattern for the ones that come with new F-150s vs what is reviewed/shown on Tirerack.com They are cheaper, made for mpg, and don't last. I replaced mine on my 2023 at 20K miles. We noticed the same thing on my wife's VW. Came with some lower-end goodyears that were replaced at 15K. Also, tread-wear warranty only applies to defects. If they wear out sooner, that generally isn't covered by any tire brand.”
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Based on 47 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 33 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 - 660 A A - B | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 24 | 24 |
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AT2 if snow matters most to you.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 68 vs 47 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 52 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 56 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 70 vs 58 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 70 vs 58 on our wet score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 71 vs 56 on our dry score.
Hankook Dynapro AT2, 61 vs 58 on our snow score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 69 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 64 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology