Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 186 + 2,129 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Ventus S1 evo2 are level at 72.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo2

Summer

Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo2 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 71 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7770

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 70.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo2 +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 73 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7572

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 78

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7564

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 64 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo2 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)76
    Reviews found online73≈ 67 (est.)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7560

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2
    Reviews found online7167
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Relative Score 72 72
Dry 73 74
Wet 74 78
Snow 65 –
Comfort 72 69
Noise 70 72
Treadwear 71 62
Handling (owners) 71 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Ventus S1 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Ventus S1 evo2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #5/10 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip performance
  • Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
  • Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
  • Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
  • Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2961
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 78 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology