Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 186 + 2,129 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Ventus S1 evo2 are level at 72.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Ventus S1 evo2 +174Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 77 70 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 70.4 = 74
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Ventus S1 evo2 +478Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 75 72 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 78
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +369Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 75 64 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 64 = 69
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Ventus S1 evo2 +272Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 73 ≈ 67 (est.) DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +962Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 75 60 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +467Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews found online 71 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 74 |
| Wet | 74 | 78 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 69 |
| Noise | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Ventus S1 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Ventus S1 evo2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #5/10 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Ventus S1 evo2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
- Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
- Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
- Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | 61 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is stronger on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Ventus S1 evo2?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology