Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 186 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 76–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 78 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +376Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 77 81 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 76
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +478Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 75 81 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 78
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +772Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 62 73 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +173Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 76 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Level70Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70
No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +576Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 75 78 DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 78 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +879Why this score
Source DynaPro A/TM RF10 Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 71 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 76 |
| Dry | 73 | 76 |
| Wet | 74 | 78 |
| Snow | 65 | 72 |
| Comfort | 72 | 73 |
| Noise | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DynaPro A/TM RF10
Defender LTX M/S
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 | #3/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
- Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions
Cons
- High upfront purchase price
- Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
- Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 71 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 72 vs 65 on snow.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 76 vs 71 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 76 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 72 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 76 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology