tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Nexen N Blue HD+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 186 + 82 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue HD+
Tire BNexen

N Blue HD+

Summer

Tests 70 · 5 tests Owners 70 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 71 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7770

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 69.6 = 72

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 73 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7573

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 72.7 = 73

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7571

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 70 + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)67
    Reviews found online73≈ 67 (est.)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for N Blue HD+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7567

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 64.5 + 40% × 66.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+
    Reviews found online7170
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Nexen N Blue HD+
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 73 72
Wet 74 73
Snow 65 –
Comfort 72 71
Noise 70 67
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 71 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

N Blue HD+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10N Blue HD+ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #15/53 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B N Blue HD+

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and very low road noise
  • Reliable and stable grip in both dry and wet conditions for normal driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users
  • Vague handling and loss of predictability when pushed hard or cornered aggressively
  • Occasional reports of shoulder cracking or ruptures
All owner themes in the N Blue HD+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Nexen N Blue HD+
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth13/32″—
UTQG560 A B—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Nexen N Blue HD+

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or N Blue HD+?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology