Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Nexen Roadian H/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen Roadian H/T
Tire BNexen

Roadian H/T

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 21 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +23
    50
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7740

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 40.3 = 50

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +17
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7552

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 57

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +14
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6239

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +20
    52
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7535

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.6 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7356

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 63

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +15
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7549

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +27
    44
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Roadian H/T
    Reviews found online7144
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Nexen Roadian H/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Nexen Roadian H/T
Relative Score 71 53
Dry 73 50
Wet 74 57
Snow 65 51
Comfort 72 52
Noise 70 63
Treadwear 71 56
Handling (owners) 71 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Roadian H/T

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Roadian H/T

Pros

  • Excellent value and affordable pricing compared to premium brands
  • Long-lasting treadwear with high mileage potential
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Excessive road noise, humming, and roaring often mistaken for bearing failure
  • Prone to picking up gravel and stones in the tread blocks
  • Poor winter and snow performance reported by some users
All owner themes in the Roadian H/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Nexen Roadian H/T
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2918
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 18″
Tread depth13/32″11/32″
UTQG560 A B520 A B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Nexen Roadian H/T

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Roadian H/T?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology