Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 275 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP is ahead, 64–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Dynapro HP +1448Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 59 37 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Dynapro HP +1355Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 67 49 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison57Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 48 Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Dynapro HP +1154Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 61 40 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison58Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 44 Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Dynapro HP +2144Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 54 (est.) Reviews found online 65 29 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP +255Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 57 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 51 |
| Dry | 62 | 48 |
| Wet | 68 | 55 |
| Snow | – | 57 |
| Comfort | 65 | 54 |
| Noise | – | 58 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Dynapro HP
51
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Dynapro HP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-03-02
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
r/VWiD4Owners
·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com
·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP
51
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 62 vs 48 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 62 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Crugen HP71?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology