Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 80–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire BMichelin

Defender LTX M/S

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Defender LTX M/S +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online6184

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Defender LTX M/S +14
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 79 (est.)
    Reviews found online6686

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 79 (est.) + 40% × 85.7 = 82

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–77

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Defender LTX M/S +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6078

    Dynapro HP: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 59.7 = 63

    Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Treadwear

    Defender LTX M/S +14
    80
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6586

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Defender LTX M/S +24
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPDefender LTX M/S
    Reviews found online5882
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HPMichelin Defender LTX M/S
Relative Score 65 80
Dry 63 79
Wet 68 82
Snow – 74
Comfort 63 75
Treadwear 66 80
Handling (owners) 58 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro HP

± 7

Defender LTX M/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Tire B Defender LTX M/S

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
  • Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions

Cons

  • High initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
  • Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Defender LTX M/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available14—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
UTQG500 A - B A - B720 - 800 B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP

Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP or Defender LTX M/S?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology