Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Nexen CP672 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 83 owner reviews. How we score
CP672 leads, 67–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
CP672 +567Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 66 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
CP672: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Level68Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
CP672: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison68Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 67 CP672: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
CP672 +267Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 65 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
CP672: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 CP672: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
No road tests of noise for CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
CP672 +166Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 67 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
CP672: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
CP672 +865Why this score
Source Dynapro HP CP672 Reviews found online 57 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 67 |
| Dry | 62 | 67 |
| Wet | 68 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 65 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
CP672
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B CP672
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
- Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
- Impressive tread life and long-term durability
Cons
- Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
- Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
- Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 14 | 41 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 14″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 460 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Nexen CP672
Narrow edge: Nexen CP672 — better handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen CP672 scores 65 vs 57 on handling.
Nexen CP672 scores 67 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or CP672?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or CP672?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or CP672?
Nexen CP672, 67 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or CP672?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or CP672?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology