tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 7 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes CF2 SUV leads, 67–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Proxes CF2 SUV or Dynapro HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer

Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 8 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Proxes CF2 SUV +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)56
    Reviews found online5973

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.9 + 40% × 73.2 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6773

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 73 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Proxes CF2 SUV +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)62
    Reviews found online6178

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 78.4 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–67
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF2 SUV +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF2 SUV +17
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HPProxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online5774
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HPToyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 64 67
Dry 62 63
Wet 68 68
Comfort 65 69
Noise – 67
Treadwear 65 67
Handling (owners) 57 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP

Proxes CF2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available1429
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — better handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 74 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology