Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 7 + 1,627 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 73–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +1375Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 59 76 Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 76.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Geolandar A/T G015 +472Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 67 78 Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 77.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 71 Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 74
-
65
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +873Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 61 76 Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison76Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 76 Reviews found online – 77 Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 76.5 = 76
-
65
Treadwear
Geolandar A/T G015 +570Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 73 Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +1774Why this score
Source Dynapro HP Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 57 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 73 |
| Dry | 62 | 75 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 65 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP
Geolandar A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Dynapro HP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 14 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 62 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology