Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 27 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 75–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 27 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +866Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 77 65 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74
Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1068Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 80 67 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78
Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
75
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +966Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 78 65 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75
Ecsta HM KH31: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1062Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 76 60 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 72
Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +965Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Ecsta HM KH31 Reviews found online 74 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 66 |
| Dry | 74 | 66 |
| Wet | 78 | 68 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 66 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Ecsta HM KH31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Ecsta HM KH31 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | #10/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Tire B Ecsta HM KH31
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high levels of ride comfort
- Strong dry-weather handling and cornering confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip reported by some users
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear on certain vehicles
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall durability and road hazard susceptibility
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 78 vs 68 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 65 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 78 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology