Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 27 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 75–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7765

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +10
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8067

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78

    Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7865

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    Ecsta HM KH31: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7660

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 72

    Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31
    Reviews found online7465
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Kumho Ecsta HM KH31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
Relative Score 75 66
Dry 74 66
Wet 78 68
Snow 69 –
Comfort 75 66
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 62
Handling (owners) 74 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

± 8

Ecsta HM KH31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynapro HP2 RA33Ecsta HM KH31ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #11/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test #10/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Ecsta HM KH31

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high levels of ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather handling and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip reported by some users
  • Reports of premature or uneven tread wear on certain vehicles
  • Occasional complaints regarding sidewall durability and road hazard susceptibility
All owner themes in the Ecsta HM KH31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available493
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Kumho Ecsta HM KH31

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 78 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 78 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Ecsta HM KH31?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology