tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads, 74–71 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7975

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8077

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7974

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7672

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2 RA33Proxes ST
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 74 71
Dry 75 72
Wet 77 75
Snow 68 66
Comfort 74 72
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 69
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available491
Rim diameters15″ – 22″19″
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Toyo Proxes ST

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 72 vs 69 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Proxes ST?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 72 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology