Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 67 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 73–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +371Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 73 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +770Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 80 70 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1058Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 50 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
74
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +668Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 77 68 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.2 = 74
Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +168Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 72 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 69
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +964Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 77 63 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +668Why this score
Source Dynapro HP2 RA33 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 74 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 67 |
| Dry | 74 | 71 |
| Wet | 77 | 70 |
| Snow | 68 | 58 |
| Comfort | 74 | 68 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Geolandar H/T G056
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 68 vs 58 on snow.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 70 on wet.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 68 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 RA33 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology