Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Dynapro HT RH12 67, 4x4 Diamaris 68.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 7 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 71 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
4x4 Diamaris: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for 4x4 Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 70 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
4x4 Diamaris: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for 4x4 Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 53 | – |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 65 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
4x4 Diamaris: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or 4x4 Diamaris. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 64 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
4x4 Diamaris: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or 4x4 Diamaris. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 57 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
4x4 Diamaris: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for 4x4 Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 65 | 71 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | Michelin 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 68 |
| Dry | 67 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 70 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 67 |
| Noise | 70 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HT RH12
4x4 Diamaris
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Based on 8 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · Michelin 4x4 Diamaris |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | — |
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris
Too close to call: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 and Michelin 4x4 Diamaris are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 is stronger on noise and treadwear. Michelin 4x4 Diamaris is stronger on handling, dry and wet. Michelin 4x4 Diamaris rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 70 vs 66 on noise.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris scores 70 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology