Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro H/T vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
S FIT AS is ahead, 59–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
S FIT AS +760Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 45 55 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53
S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
53
Wet
S FIT AS +558Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 47 54 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53
S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
No road tests of wet for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
Dynapro H/T +650Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 47 37 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56
S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 50
No road tests of snow for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
S FIT AS +961Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 58 Dynapro H/T: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52
S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
53
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1467Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 44 56 Dynapro H/T: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
43
Handling (owners)
S FIT AS +1255Why this score
Source Dynapro H/T S FIT AS Reviews found online 43 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro H/T | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 59 |
| Dry | 53 | 60 |
| Wet | 53 | 58 |
| Snow | 56 | 50 |
| Comfort | 52 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
Dynapro H/T
59
/ 100
S FIT AS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro H/T
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and quiet ride
- High comfort and smooth highway performance
- Balanced wet and dry braking for casual driving
Cons
- Terrible winter and snow traction due to hard rubber compound
- Poor wet traction leading to wheel spin on acceleration
- Severe balancing and out-of-round issues reported by some users
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro H/T | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 - 700 A - B A - B | 500 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro H/T
59
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro H/T if snow matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro H/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 55 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 60 vs 53 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro H/T
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 58 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 60 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Hankook Dynapro H/T, 56 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 61 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro H/T or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology