tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 5 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo2 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo2 or Dynapro M/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire AHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo2

Winter

± 7

Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo2 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6471

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 70.8 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo2 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6673

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo2 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 70 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6866

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.1 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo2 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5371

    Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58

    Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–47
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 55

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo2 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6673

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo2 +12
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Reviews found online6173
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–59
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro M/THankook Winter i cept evo2
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 66 67
Wet 68 71
Snow 69 70
Comfort 58 70
Noise – 55
Treadwear 66 70
Handling (owners) 61 73
Efficiency – 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro M/T

± 7

Winter i cept evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynapro M/TWinter i cept evo2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/10 2016 All Terrain and Off Road MT Tyre Test #5/11 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Tire B Winter i cept evo2

Pros

  • Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
  • Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro M/T B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
CategoryMud-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—79
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 73 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology