tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Nexen Roadian H/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro M/T is ahead, 66–53

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire AHankook

Dynapro M/T

Mud-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews

Nexen Roadian H/T
Tire BNexen

Roadian H/T

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 21 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Dynapro M/T +15
    50
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6440

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 40.3 = 50

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Dynapro M/T +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6752

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Dynapro M/T +18
    51
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6939

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Dynapro M/T +9
    52
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5435

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 61

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.6 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Roadian H/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Dynapro M/T +10
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6749

    Dynapro M/T: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 66

    Roadian H/T: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro M/T +17
    44
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro M/TRoadian H/T
    Reviews found online6144
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Dynapro M/TNexen Roadian H/T
Relative Score 66 53
Dry 65 50
Wet 68 57
Snow 69 51
Comfort 61 52
Noise – 63
Treadwear 66 56
Handling (owners) 61 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro M/T

Roadian H/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro M/T

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD

Cons

  • Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
  • Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
  • Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
All owner themes in the Dynapro M/T review

Tire B Roadian H/T

Pros

  • Excellent value and affordable pricing compared to premium brands
  • Long-lasting treadwear with high mileage potential
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Excessive road noise, humming, and roaring often mistaken for bearing failure
  • Prone to picking up gravel and stones in the tread blocks
  • Poor winter and snow performance reported by some users
All owner themes in the Roadian H/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro M/T B · Nexen Roadian H/T
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—18
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—520 A B
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro M/T

Nexen Roadian H/T

Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 69 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 61 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 65 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 68 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 65 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 69 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 61 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Roadian H/T?

Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology