Head-to-head Updated

Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 33 road tests and 12 + 21,726 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: iON FlexClimate 86, CrossClimate 2 87.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
Tire AHankook

iON FlexClimate

All Season

± 5

Tests 88 · 3 tests Owners 86 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2026 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test for EVs (215/55 R18) (dry handling)

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,726 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 93

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +2
    95
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 31 tests10099
    Reviews found online8488
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1100%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%97%

    iON FlexClimate: 60% × 99.5 + 40% × 83.6 = 93

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

  2. 92

    Wet

    iON FlexClimate +5
    87
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 31 tests9483
    Reviews found online8992
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%91%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%96%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%95%

    iON FlexClimate: 60% × 94.4 + 40% × 88.8 = 92

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.7 = 87

  3. 81

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +9
    90
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 27 tests8299
    Reviews found online8078
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%100%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–299%100%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%100%

    iON FlexClimate: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 79.9 = 81

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.2 = 90

  4. 79

    Comfort

    Level
    79
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7267
    Reviews found online8386

    iON FlexClimate: 40% × 71.9 + 60% × 83.3 = 79

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.2 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

  5. 72

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +7
    79
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 20 tests7677
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)83

    iON FlexClimate: 60% × 76.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for iON FlexClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 84

    Treadwear

    Level
    84
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests8181
    Reviews found online8888

    iON FlexClimate: 60% × 81.3 + 40% × 88.3 = 84

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

  7. 85

    Handling (owners)

    iON FlexClimate +3
    82
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online8582
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +19
    90
    Why this score
    SourceiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 23 tests7190
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
Scores at a glance
Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook iON FlexClimateMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 86 87
Dry 93 95
Wet 92 87
Snow 81 90
Comfort 79 79
Noise 72 79
Treadwear 84 84
Handling (owners) 85 82
Efficiency 71 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

iON FlexClimate

± 4

CrossClimate 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Hankook iON FlexClimate finished ahead 2 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryiON FlexClimateCrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 98% +1.4 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 100% 97% +2.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test · 245/45 R19
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 100% 91% +9.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test · 245/45 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% 94% +6.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 100% 96% +4.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Wet Circle Wet 100% 95% +5.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 100% 95% +4.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Braking Snow 98% 100% −1.4 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Snow Handling Snow 99% 100% −1.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Snow Traction Snow 96% 100% −3.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 99% 100% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test · 245/45 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/5 #2/5 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report · 235/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A iON FlexClimate

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet cabin experience
  • Superior ride comfort over bumpy roads
  • Excellent grip and braking performance in wet and snowy winter conditions

Cons

  • Slightly reduced dry grip compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Some EV drivers reported a noticeable negative impact on driving range and efficiency
All owner themes in the iON FlexClimate review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook iON FlexClimate

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook iON FlexClimate B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1592
Rim diameters18″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook iON FlexClimate

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Too close to call: Hankook iON FlexClimate and Michelin CrossClimate 2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook iON FlexClimate is stronger on wet. Michelin CrossClimate 2 is stronger on efficiency, snow and noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 71 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 81 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 72 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook iON FlexClimate scores 92 vs 87 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook iON FlexClimate
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Hankook iON FlexClimate, 92 vs 87 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 93 vs 95 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 81 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 72 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 79 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 84 vs 84 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, iON FlexClimate or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 71 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology