Hankook Optimo H724 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Hankook Optimo H724 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 14 + 169 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Hankook Optimo H724
Tire BHankook

Optimo H724

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 169 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    Optimo H724: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7167

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71 = 73

    Optimo H724: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 70

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Kinergy 4S +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Optimo H724: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    Optimo H724 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)69

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 60

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Optimo H724 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6367

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 62.9 = 63

    Optimo H724: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Reviews found online64–
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SOptimo H724
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Hankook Optimo H724: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SHankook Optimo H724
Relative Score 68 66
Dry 69 66
Wet 73 68
Snow 70 63
Comfort 67 65
Noise 60 67
Treadwear 63 67
Handling (owners) 64 –
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Kinergy 4S

± 7

Optimo H724

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B Optimo H724

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Hankook Optimo H724
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available67—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG500 - 600 A A500 A B
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Hankook Optimo H724

Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Hankook Optimo H724 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Optimo H724 scores 67 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Optimo H724 scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H724

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Which is better in the wet, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Hankook Optimo H724, 67 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Kinergy 4S or Optimo H724?

Hankook Optimo H724, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology