Kumho Solus 4 All Weather looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho Solus 4 All Weather — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 13 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire AHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 67 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online69–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 68.5 = 69

  2. 73

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online71–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71.1 = 73

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online76–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 76 = 70

  4. 67

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62–
    Reviews found online62–

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 62 = 62

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Reviews found online64–
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceKinergy 4SSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho Solus 4 All Weather: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy 4SKumho Solus 4 All Weather
Relative Score 68 –
Dry 69 –
Wet 73 –
Snow 70 –
Comfort 67 –
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 62 –
Handling (owners) 64 –
Efficiency 67 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Kinergy 4S

Solus 4 All Weather

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryKinergy 4SSolus 4 All WeatherΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test #4/10 2012 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Tire B Solus 4 All Weather

Pros

  • Reliable traction in dry conditions
  • Confident performance on wet surfaces
  • Effective capability in light snow

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear
  • Poor overall longevity compared to summer tires
  • Lack of cost-effectiveness due to frequent replacement intervals
All owner themes in the Solus 4 All Weather review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy 4S B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available67—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

Only Hankook Kinergy 4S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology