Kumho Solus 4 All Weather looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Kumho Solus 4 All Weather — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 9 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests82–
    Reviews found online66–

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82 + 40% × 65.6 = 75

  2. 77

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests81–
    Reviews found online72–

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 71.8 = 77

  3. 61

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62–
    Reviews found online61–

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 61 = 61

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Reviews found online68–
  7. 44

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVSolus 4 All Weather
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests44–
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Kumho Solus 4 All Weather: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVKumho Solus 4 All Weather
Relative Score 71 –
Dry 75 –
Wet 77 –
Comfort 61 –
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 59 –
Handling (owners) 68 –
Efficiency 44 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

Solus 4 All Weather

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFK510 SUVSolus 4 All WeatherΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #4/10 2012 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B Solus 4 All Weather

Pros

  • Reliable traction in dry conditions
  • Confident performance on wet surfaces
  • Effective capability in light snow

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear
  • Poor overall longevity compared to summer tires
  • Lack of cost-effectiveness due to frequent replacement intervals
All owner themes in the Solus 4 All Weather review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather
CategorySummerAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available48—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

Only Falken FK510 SUV has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology