Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 693 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 noble2 is ahead, 63–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 693 reviews
“New shoes: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. 255/40-18”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Ventus S1 noble2 +1366Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 65 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Ventus S1 noble2 +1168Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 68 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Ventus S1 noble2 +156Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 46 46 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 56
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Ventus S1 noble2 +1367Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 40 65 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Level56Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 49 50 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Ventus S1 noble2 +1864Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 46 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 63 |
| Dry | 53 | 66 |
| Wet | 57 | 68 |
| Snow | 55 | 56 |
| Comfort | 54 | 67 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 56 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Optimo H725
Ventus S1 noble2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ventus S1 noble2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness
- Very low road noise and quiet highway cruising
- Strong dry traction and responsive handling
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, frequently failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor traction and dangerous handling in snow, slush, and ice
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering response or 'squishy' cornering feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Optimo H725
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.
“My car originally came with 225/40/19 and 245/40/19, I then went to the other OEMs 225/45/18 and 245/45/18. But the 225/50/18 an 245/50/18 is the best yet. Way better ride, fills up the wheel wells and corrected the speedo error.”
“Not many years back, I would not have even given thought to a tire with 500 treadwear - no grip & hard as a rock. It doesn't seem to apply anymore. Modern compounds are such that a tire can be built to both grip And last. I doubt I will ever buy a tire under 300 treadwear again (used to look for 200). It will probably be fall before I purchase, but these S1 Noble 2's are on the short list.”
“New shoes: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. 255/40-18”
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 8 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H725
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 64 vs 46 on handling.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 66 vs 53 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 68 vs 57 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2, 68 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2, 66 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 56 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Ventus S1 noble2?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 56 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology