tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

CP672 is ahead, 66–57

Check price on Amazon · CP672 or OPTIMO ME02 K424 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    CP672 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5565

    OPTIMO ME02 K424: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60

    CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for OPTIMO ME02 K424. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 50

    Wet

    CP672 +16
    66
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4364

    OPTIMO ME02 K424: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 42.7 = 50

    CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for OPTIMO ME02 K424. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    CP672: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    CP672 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5462

    OPTIMO ME02 K424: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.2 = 59

    CP672: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    CP672 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6171

    OPTIMO ME02 K424: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 64

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 68

    No road tests of noise for OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    CP672 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6166

    OPTIMO ME02 K424: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for OPTIMO ME02 K424. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    CP672 +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424CP672
    Reviews found online5162
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook OPTIMO ME02 K424Nexen CP672
Relative Score 57 66
Dry 60 66
Wet 50 66
Snow – 67
Comfort 59 64
Noise 64 68
Treadwear 63 66
Handling (owners) 51 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

OPTIMO ME02 K424

± 7

CP672

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A OPTIMO ME02 K424

Pros

  • Available in hard-to-find niche sizes such as for the Geo Metro
  • Long-lasting tread life due to a harder rubber compound
  • Affordable pricing and accessible delivery

Cons

  • Alarmingly poor wet grip leading to frequent skidding and loss of control
  • Extended stopping distances in rainy conditions despite vehicle safety systems like ABS and traction control
  • Noticeable squealing during dry cornering due to hard compound
All owner themes in the OPTIMO ME02 K424 review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 B · Nexen CP672
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—41
Rim diameters—14″ – 18″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424

Nexen CP672

Winner: Nexen CP672 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen CP672 scores 62 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP672 scores 64 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP672
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, OPTIMO ME02 K424 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology