Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 0 road tests and 2,509 + 277 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–47

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire AHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,509 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 277 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +36
    44
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests84≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7332

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.9 = 44

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +26
    52
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests81≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7545

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–42

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +24
    45
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6833

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.9 = 69

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Ventus Prime 4 +6
    55
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests58≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)37

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 55

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +37
    37
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests78≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online6718

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.2 = 37

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +20
    52
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online7252
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests83–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Crugen HP71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 75 47
Dry 80 44
Wet 78 52
Snow – 53
Comfort 69 45
Noise 61 55
Treadwear 74 37
Handling (owners) 72 52
Efficiency 83 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Ventus Prime 4

± 8

Crugen HP71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus Prime 4Crugen HP71ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/CX5 ·1 upvote ·2026-10-04

“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”

r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”

r/KiaEV6 ·2 upvotes ·2023-06-08

“Tire troubles - 19" Kumho Crugen HP71 I have a US spec 2022 Wind AWD with 23,000 miles on these Kumho tires. In my less than 9 months of ownership I've had two tires patched from slow leaks and I just had to have the foam lining removed from a tire since it separated from the inner tire wall and created massive vibrations in the steering wheel. With one of the patches my local shop pulled a stone that was less than 1/4" from the tread where it punctured the tire. Yes, it was pointy and sharp but also comically tiny. I'm I just extra special lucky or are others having issues with these tires? I really hope there are more options for our vehicles when it comes time to replace these.”

Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategorySummerSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6663
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—9.9/32″
UTQG—640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 69 vs 45 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 61 vs 55 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 4 or Crugen HP71?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology