Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 211 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus R-S4 and ADVAN A052 are level at 72.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 211 reviews
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 69 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 73 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 90 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 90.4 = 80
No road tests of dry for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 67 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
ADVAN A052: 60% × 78 + 40% × 67.4 = 74
No road tests of wet for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 75 |
ADVAN A052: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 63 |
Ventus R-S4: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 63.4 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ventus R-S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 77 |
| Reviews found online | – | 77 |
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77 + 40% × 76.9 = 77
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 39 |
Ventus R-S4: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 73
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus R-S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Ventus R-S4 | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 85 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus R-S4 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 72 |
| Dry | 76 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 59 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus R-S4
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community holds a very positive view of the Hankook Ventus R-S4, praising its exceptional grip, excellent treadwear, and durability on the track. Users also note that it provides a surprisingly smooth and quiet ride for street use, though some mention it requires heat cycling management as it ages.
“Super happy w Hankook Ventus R-S4s. Follow-up question. I'm 10 track days into owning my first set of Hankook Ventus R-S4s. Thanks for the recommendation. I rotate them after every 2 days on my ND miata. I'm noticing the forewarned heat cycling now. TBH - I like them more now. Car moves around more and i have to modulate brakes myself. When they were new I couldn't get the abs engaged - there was just too much grip for the stock equipment. Anyway, my question is - my research says that with this Tire the grip can drop off quickly. Is that accurate? now that I'm getting into this gray area where they are definitely starting to heat cycle out am I going to leave an event Sunday with 80% new level grip and show up to my next track day two Weeks later at 30%? Edit. I’m working with some assumptions here that might not be valid. I’m assuming I’m getting heat cycling performance drop because I was warned I would heat cycle them out before I wore them down to chords. I am definitely experiencing a noticeable drop in mechanical grip during breaking. I am much more capable of getting into the ABS now than I was on the first days on these tires. My last track weekend was also on a set of pads that are near life end so I think that variable is accounted for. That same weekend was cooler than normal and I noticed the performance drop the entire day not, for example, on cold tires or late in a heavy session.”
“I had the DW's on my Porsche 911 last year and really liked them. I liked them so much, I just installed a set on my C6 base. I waiting for the 3' of snow to melt before I try them out.”
Based on 10 community posts
Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Based on 11 community posts
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Hankook Ventus R-S4
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus R-S4 and Yokohama ADVAN A052 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama ADVAN A052 is stronger on comfort, wet and dry.
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 73 vs 50 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 76 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 76 on our dry score.
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus R-S4, 73 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology