tirewheelguide

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 121 + 12,721 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–60

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport 4 or Ventus V12 evo K110 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +27
    87
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 63 (est.)89
    Reviews found online5684

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 60

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 84 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +29
    89
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 62 (est.)93
    Reviews found online5685

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 84.5 = 89

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 50

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online35–

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +16
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 66 (est.)81
    Reviews found online5672

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.7 = 60

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.2 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online52≈ 66 (est.)

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 60

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5160

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +18
    81
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online6381
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–76
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo K110Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score 60 82
Dry 60 87
Wet 60 89
Snow 50 –
Comfort 60 76
Noise 60 70
Treadwear 57 71
Handling (owners) 63 81
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ventus V12 evo K110

± 4

Pilot Sport 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus V12 evo K110Pilot Sport 4ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo K110

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
  • Low road noise and high comfort levels

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
  • Faster-than-average tread wear
  • Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo K110 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/TeslaModelS ·1 upvote ·2025-03-27

“I was running pilot sport 4s on my MS. (19” wheels) I was lucky to get 13,000-14,000. I just switched to Kumho Majesty 9’s for about 1/3 the price. Currently have 4,000 miles on them and just to rotated. Fingers crossed I can get 13,000 miles out of them.”
r/JettaGLI ·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by weston.__ I will be going down the non-rft route, Pilot Sport 4. You're not the only one to say the ride quality with non-rft is a massive improvement and this is the reason why I will change once the time comes. I went from Bridgestone S001 RFT to 'go-flats' and have found the suppleness an obvious difference. Since I put the pressure to the mid point between the low and high load plated pressures I have yet to have any of the heartstopping thumps come through the suspension that the Bridgestone seemed prone to.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—62
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG280 A A300 - 320 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo K110 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology