Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 121 reviews
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 vs Nitto NT555 G2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 121 + 412 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus V12 evo K110 and NT555 G2 are level at 58.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 60 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 412 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Update! I ended up going with the Nitto NT555 G2’s, thanks for all the suggestions. They are amazing tires! They ride smooth for an ultra performance, the price was friendly, and they grip extremely well!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Ventus V12 evo K110 +555Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 56 64 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 60
NT555 G2: 60% × 49 + 40% × 63.9 = 55
No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
Ventus V12 evo K110 +951Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 56 54 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
NT555 G2: 60% × 48.3 + 40% × 53.9 = 51
No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Snow
Ventus V12 evo K110 +248Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 35 33 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 50
NT555 G2: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 32.7 = 48
No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
NT555 G2 +666Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 65 Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 55.7 = 60
NT555 G2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
NT555 G2 +565Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 52 64 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 60
NT555 G2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
NT555 G2 +1976Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 51 66 Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
NT555 G2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Ventus V12 evo K110 +162Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo K110 NT555 G2 Reviews found online 63 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 | Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 58 |
| Dry | 60 | 55 |
| Wet | 60 | 51 |
| Snow | 50 | 48 |
| Comfort | 60 | 66 |
| Noise | 60 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus V12 evo K110
NT555 G2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ventus V12 evo K110 | NT555 G2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test | #10/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus V12 evo K110
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
- Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
- Low road noise and high comfort levels
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
- Faster-than-average tread wear
- Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
Tire B NT555 G2
Pros
- Aggressive, visually appealing tread pattern and sidewall design
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin or Pirelli
- Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rates for a summer performance tire
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction, with multiple users reporting hydroplaning and a slippery feel in the rain
- Lack of straight-line traction and wheel spin under heavy acceleration, especially on high-horsepower RWD vehicles
- Subpar performance in cooler temperatures or cold conditions, requiring heat to grip properly
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Nitto NT555 G2
Owners praise the NT555 G2 for its low price, quiet and smooth ride, good dry grip for street use, and long tread life (often 20k–50k+ miles). Many others report weak performance in cold and wet conditions, poor traction off the line on powerful cars (easy wheelspin), and flat-spotting after sitting. Some report quality issues such as balance problems, cracking and belt failure. It is often judged a budget or mid-tier performance tire that falls short of Michelin PS4S and Continental alternatives.
“I can't compare Nitto to Conti directly. I replaced my OEM GY supercars with NT555 G2. Here's what I see: Above say 60 degrees, tires warm, Nittos lose probably 15-20% of the grip of the GYs. 40-60 degrees, tires warm, the Nittos start to equal out the GY's as you get closer to 40. Below 40 degrees, Nittos grip better, without question, mostly because it gets hard to get enough heat in the GYs unless you drive like an idiot. Below 30 degrees the GY's are hockey pucks, don't even try it. Just my unscientific observation. Your mileage may vary. I will say going from the runflat GYs to the Nittos was a great improvement in harshness of ride. I only have a few thousand miles on them so I can't speak to longevity, but anything has to be better than the GY's in that area. If someone can compare Contis to GYs, it should tell you the rest of the story.”
“I bought some because they are one of the few available in 315/35R17. At first I didn't like them, too easy to spin and the back end kicked to the left. Then I discovered they worked great at 38psi. I've never had problems with flat spots even after setting for several months. I would buy them again.”
“Staggered tire recommendations? Title. I have 17x9 rims up front and 17x10.5 rims in the rear. Currently running 245/45R17 on the front and 275/40R17 in the rear. Ideally I’d like to keep these tire sizes. Tires all around are Nitto NT555 G2 tires, and I’m just not happy at all with the grip. They’re fine around corners, but if I even breathe on the throttle at all in 1st gear, I’m instantly spinning. It’s sketchy as fuck in the rain, too. I wanted Continental DWS06 tires, but they don’t make those in a 275/40R17 for my rear tires. I’d only be able to get the fronts. Thinking about Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4s, but not sure. I want to be able to handle well enough around corners, handle Ohio weather no matter what it’s doing, and I wanna be able to floor it in 1st gear and get very little wheel spin. Obviously not trying to drive the car in snow, it’s still mostly gonna see nice weather and occasional rain, I usually like to store the car over the winter and drive something else. But still, Ohio is Ohio, and our weather can absolutely never make up its damn mind. So, I come asking for tire recommendations. Don’t really mind price all too much, but my car is completely stock engine wise minus the exhaust, so it’s not like I’m pushing crazy power. I “daily” this car whenever the weather is nice, so I just need a streetable all season tire that won’t lose grip instantly whenever I try having a little fun. Thanks!”
Based on 85 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 | B · Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 88 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10.2/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Nitto NT555 G2
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 and Nitto NT555 G2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 is stronger on wet and dry. Nitto NT555 G2 is stronger on treadwear, comfort and noise.
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 76 vs 57 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 60 vs 51 on wet.
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 60 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, 60 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, 60 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Neither, by our numbers: 50 vs 48 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 65 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo K110 or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 76 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology