tirewheelguide

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 121 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–58

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ventus V12 evo K110 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    74
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5667

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 60

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5664

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 49

    Snow

    Ventus V12 evo K110 +14
    35
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online3613

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5662

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 56.1 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5260

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5159

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6372
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo K110Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 58 65
Dry 60 74
Wet 60 68
Snow 49 35
Comfort 60 62
Noise 61 69
Treadwear 57 69
Handling (owners) 63 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ventus V12 evo K110

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryVentus V12 evo K110ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tyre Test #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo K110

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
  • Low road noise and high comfort levels

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
  • Faster-than-average tread wear
  • Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo K110 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG280 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, treadwear and handling. Pick the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 scores 49 vs 35 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, 49 vs 35 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo K110 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology