Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 68 · 93 reviews
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Kumho Ecsta PA31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 23 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Ventus V12 evo2 +1062Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 – Reviews found online 72 58 -
71
Wet
Ventus V12 evo2 +764Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) 71 – Reviews found online 71 63 -
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online – 53 -
68
Comfort
Ventus V12 evo2 +662Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online 66 54 -
75
Noise
Ventus V12 evo2 +867Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) 80 – Reviews found online – 66 -
63
Treadwear
Ventus V12 evo2 +360Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online 61 56 -
69
Handling
Ventus V12 evo2 +1653Why this score
Source Ventus V12 evo2 Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online 69 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 61 |
| Dry | 72 | 62 |
| Wet | 71 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | 75 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 60 |
| Handling | 69 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Ventus V12 evo2
Ecsta PA31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus V12 evo2
Pros
- Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable ride with low initial road noise
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
- Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
- Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
Tire B Ecsta PA31
Pros
- Affordable price and high overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence
Cons
- Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
- Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
- Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Kumho Ecsta PA31
Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 53 on handling.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 72 vs 62 on dry.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 75 vs 67 on noise.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.