Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Yokohama Advan A10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 93 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan A10
Tire BYokohama

Advan A10

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 18 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7151

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Advan A10: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7349

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 72.8 = 71

    Advan A10: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +25
    41
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6528

    Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.9 = 66

    Advan A10: 40% × 60.4 (est.) + 60% × 27.7 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 62

    Treadwear

    Ventus V12 evo2 +16
    46
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online5834

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 62

    Advan A10: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +28
    42
    Why this score
    SourceVentus V12 evo2Advan A10
    Reviews found online7042
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Yokohama Advan A10: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus V12 evo2Yokohama Advan A10
Relative Score 69 52
Dry 71 57
Wet 71 55
Comfort 66 41
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 62 46
Handling (owners) 70 42

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ventus V12 evo2

± 8

Advan A10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Tire B Advan A10

Pros

  • Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
  • High level of responsiveness and handling precision
  • Strong performance in warm, dry climates

Cons

  • Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
  • High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 B · Yokohama Advan A10
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available385
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 18″
UTQG320 - 380 A - AA A—
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Yokohama Advan A10

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan A10 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 70 vs 42 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 66 vs 41 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 62 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A10

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus V12 evo2 or Advan A10?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus V12 evo2 or Advan A10?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus V12 evo2 or Advan A10?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus V12 evo2 or Advan A10?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 66 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus V12 evo2 or Advan A10?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 62 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology