Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 28 reviews
Hankook Winter i*cept evo vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 28 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i*cept evo leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 5 tests Owners 67 · 6 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Winter i*cept evo +367Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 71 65 Winter i*cept evo: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of dry for Winter i*cept evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
76
Wet
Winter i*cept evo3 X +177Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 78 71 Winter i*cept evo: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 76
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 70.8 = 77
No road tests of wet for Winter i*cept evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Winter i*cept evo3 X +178Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 82 73 Winter i*cept evo: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.3 = 77
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 81.3 + 40% × 72.7 = 78
No road tests of snow for Winter i*cept evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
Winter i*cept evo +1358Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 53 Winter i*cept evo: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 52.7 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison40Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 23 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 22.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 40
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*cept evo3 X. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Winter i*cept evo +565Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Winter i*cept evo: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70
Winter i*cept evo3 X: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*cept evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*cept evo3 X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Winter i*cept evo +567Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Reviews found online 72 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source Winter i*cept evo Winter i*cept evo3 X Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept evo | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 71 |
| Dry | 70 | 67 |
| Wet | 76 | 77 |
| Snow | 77 | 78 |
| Comfort | 71 | 58 |
| Noise | – | 40 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winter i*cept evo
Winter i*cept evo3 X
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winter i*cept evo | Winter i*cept evo3 X | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2013 Auto Bild Sports Winter Tyre Test | #7/11 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winter i*cept evo
Pros
- Exceptional grip and capability in deep snow and ice
- Favorable price-to-performance/value ratio compared to premium brands
- Good aquaplaning resistance and handling in heavy rain
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet weather traction reported by some drivers
- Prone to wheelspin under acceleration in damp or cold conditions
- Squirmy feel or reduced stability in warmer weather or at high highway speeds
Tire B Winter i*cept evo3 X
Pros
- Exceptional performance and traction in various snow conditions (fresh, compact, and heavy wet snow)
- Strong braking capability and confidence in low temperatures and wet roads
- Cost-effective alternative compared to tier-one premium brand tires
Cons
- High noise levels reported by some users
- Ride comfort can feel stiff or uncomfortable on certain SUV applications
- Compound feels too soft in warm weather conditions above 13 degrees Celsius
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo | B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 72 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Winter i*cept evo
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X
Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i*cept evo — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Where the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 71 vs 58 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 70 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Which is better in the wet, Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Hankook Winter i*cept evo, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Hankook Winter i*cept evo, 71 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winter i*cept evo or Winter i*cept evo3 X?
Hankook Winter i*cept evo, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology