Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 0 road tests and 28 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo2
± 7

Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Riken Raptor HR
Tire BRiken

Raptor HR

Grand Touring All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests65–
    Reviews found online71–

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 71.3 = 67

  2. 71

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online74–

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 73.5 = 71

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests72–
    Reviews found online66–

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.4 = 70

  4. 70

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests47–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 55

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67–
    Reviews found online73–

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 72.6 = 69

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Reviews found online73–
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinter i cept evo2Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests59–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 vs Riken Raptor HR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i cept evo2Riken Raptor HR
Relative Score 69 –
Dry 67 –
Wet 71 –
Snow 70 –
Comfort 70 –
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 69 –
Handling (owners) 73 –
Efficiency 59 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Winter i cept evo2

Raptor HR

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winter i cept evo2

Pros

  • Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
  • Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo2 review

Tire B Raptor HR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 B · Riken Raptor HR
CategoryWinterGrand Touring All-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available79—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

Riken Raptor HR

Only Hankook Winter i cept evo2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology