Head-to-head Updated

Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 15 + 31 road tests and 32 + 3,362 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact 2 leads, 82–80 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kleber Quadraxer 3
Tire AKleber

Quadraxer 3

All Season

± 4

Tests 80 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 32 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (snow handling)

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

AllSeasonContact 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 85 · 31 tests Owners 80 · 3,362 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Iskustvo sa Continental AllseasonContact 2 Kupio ih u 10 mjesecu prošle godine zasada sam izrazito zadovoljan kako su se pokazale kroz zimu,pa me zanima kako su se vama pokazale kroz vise godina,pogotovo kroz ljeto.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 9 tests that measured dry braking for both, Quadraxer 3 won 9 and AllSeasonContact 2 won 0 (average 96% vs 92% of the best).
  • In 9 tests that measured wet braking for both, Quadraxer 3 won 0 and AllSeasonContact 2 won 9 (average 91% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured dry handling for both, Quadraxer 3 won 2 and AllSeasonContact 2 won 3 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Quadraxer 3 won 5 and AllSeasonContact 2 won 0 (average 97% vs 92% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet handling for both, Quadraxer 3 won 0 and AllSeasonContact 2 won 5 (average 94% vs 99% of the best).
  1. 85

    Dry

    Quadraxer 3 +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests8987
    Reviews found online7979
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 9–096%92%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–398%99%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–170%90%

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.5 = 85

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 83

  2. 82

    Wet

    AllSeasonContact 2 +9
    91
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests8294
    Reviews found online8287
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–091%84%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–097%92%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–160%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–991%97%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–394%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–594%99%

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 81.8 = 82

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 86.7 = 91

  3. 82

    Snow

    Quadraxer 3 +1
    81
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 24 tests8685
    Reviews found online7576
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–195%95%
    Snow Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%97%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–298%99%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%96%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–297%96%
    Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–170%80%

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 75.4 = 82

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 81

  4. 74

    Comfort

    AllSeasonContact 2 +13
    87
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 9 tests6192
    Reviews found online8283
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–276%95%

    Quadraxer 3: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 82 = 74

    AllSeasonContact 2: 40% × 91.5 + 60% × 83.3 = 87

  5. 72

    Noise

    AllSeasonContact 2 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 23 tests7679
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–299%99%

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    No owner ratings of noise for Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Quadraxer 3 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests7277
    Reviews found online8074
    Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–089%70%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–270%76%

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 80.1 = 76

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 73.9 = 75

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    AllSeasonContact 2 +4
    81
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Reviews found online7781
  8. 77

    Efficiency

    AllSeasonContact 2 +7
    84
    Why this score
    SourceQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 24 tests7784
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%96%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–393%94%
Scores at a glance
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKleber Quadraxer 3Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Relative Score 80 82
Dry 85 83
Wet 82 91
Snow 82 81
Comfort 74 87
Noise 72 74
Treadwear 76 75
Handling (owners) 77 81
Efficiency 77 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Quadraxer 3

± 4

AllSeasonContact 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 12 tests that ran both, Kleber Quadraxer 3 finished ahead 0 times and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 12 times.

DisciplineCategoryQuadraxer 3AllSeasonContact 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 92% +4.2 9–0 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.9 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 70% 90% −20.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 91% 84% +7.3 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 92% +4.8 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 91% 97% −6.3 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Circle Wet 94% 98% −3.8 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 94% 99% −4.9 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 60% 100% −40.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 95% 95% −0.3 3–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Circle Snow 96% 97% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Handling Snow 98% 99% −0.2 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 70% 80% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Slalom Snow 96% 96% −0.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Traction Snow 97% 96% +0.5 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 76% 95% −18.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 99% 99% 0.0 2–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 89% 70% +19.4 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 70% 76% −5.8 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 96% +0.9 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 93% 94% −0.5 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #6/15 #13/15 – 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 64% 59% +5.7 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 60% 80% −20.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #8/9 #1/9 – 0–12 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 · 195/55R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quadraxer 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • Reliable traction and safety in light snow and winter conditions

Cons

  • Tread compound can harden or degrade in performance over multiple years
  • Increased road noise and roar reported at higher highway speeds (above 135 km/h)
  • Occasional reports of reduced grip or cracking as the tire reaches the end of its lifespan
All owner themes in the Quadraxer 3 review

Tire B AllSeasonContact 2

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and short braking distances
  • High level of ride comfort with excellent bump absorption
  • Noticeably quiet and refined cabin noise compared to predecessors

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can result in delayed steering response or a less sharp initial turn-in feel
  • Faster tread wear reported by some users, particularly on front-wheel-drive or heavier vehicles
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage or delamination from severe potholes
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kleber Quadraxer 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Positive

The community generally rates the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its wet grip, comfort, quietness, durability/mileage and capable all-weather performance including snow and Alpine ski trips. It is frequently chosen over the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Pirelli Cinturato SF3, though some users report weaker aquaplaning as tread wears, road noise on rough roads, and premature edge wear or cracking on front tyres.

Top themes
#Wet grip#Comfort and quietness#Snow and winter capability#Comparison with CrossClimate 2#Comparison with Pirelli SF3#Front tyre edge wear#Tread life and durability#Aquaplaning at low tread

Based on 70 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kleber Quadraxer 3 B · Continental AllSeasonContact 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available71138
Rim diameters14″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Sizes in common5656

Which one should you actually buy?

Kleber Quadraxer 3

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Narrow edge: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — better comfort, wet and efficiency. Where the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 87 vs 74 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 91 vs 82 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 84 vs 77 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 3 won 9 of 9 shared dry braking tests.

Tire A · Kleber Quadraxer 3
Tire B · Continental AllSeasonContact 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Which is better in the wet, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 91 vs 82 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 85 vs 83 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 82 vs 81 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 87 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 84 vs 77 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology