Tests 80 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (snow handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 15 + 31 road tests and 32 + 3,362 owner reviews. How we score
AllSeasonContact 2 leads, 82–80 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (snow handling)
Tests 85 · 31 tests Owners 80 · 3,362 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Iskustvo sa Continental AllseasonContact 2 Kupio ih u 10 mjesecu prošle godine zasada sam izrazito zadovoljan kako su se pokazale kroz zimu,pa me zanima kako su se vama pokazale kroz vise godina,pogotovo kroz ljeto.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests | 89 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 79 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 9–0 | 96% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–3 | 98% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 70% | 90% |
Quadraxer 3: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.5 = 85
AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 83
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests | 82 | 94 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 87 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–0 | 91% | 84% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–0 | 97% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 60% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–9 | 91% | 97% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 94% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 | 94% | 99% |
Quadraxer 3: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 81.8 = 82
AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 86.7 = 91
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 24 tests | 86 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 76 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–1 | 95% | 95% |
| Snow Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 96% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–2 | 98% | 99% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 96% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–2 | 97% | 96% |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 70% | 80% |
Quadraxer 3: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 75.4 = 82
AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 81
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 9 tests | 61 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 83 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 76% | 95% |
Quadraxer 3: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 82 = 74
AllSeasonContact 2: 40% × 91.5 + 60% × 83.3 = 87
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 23 tests | 76 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–2 | 99% | 99% |
Quadraxer 3: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for Quadraxer 3 or AllSeasonContact 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests | 72 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 74 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 89% | 70% |
| Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–2 | 70% | 76% |
Quadraxer 3: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 80.1 = 76
AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 73.9 = 75
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 81 |
| Source | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 24 tests | 77 | 84 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 97% | 96% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–3 | 93% | 94% |
| Category | Kleber Quadraxer 3 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 82 |
| Dry | 85 | 83 |
| Wet | 82 | 91 |
| Snow | 82 | 81 |
| Comfort | 74 | 87 |
| Noise | 72 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Quadraxer 3
AllSeasonContact 2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 12 tests that ran both, Kleber Quadraxer 3 finished ahead 0 times and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 12 times.
| Discipline | Category | Quadraxer 3 | AllSeasonContact 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 92% | +4.2 | 9–0 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 99% | −0.9 | 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 70% | 90% | −20.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% | 84% | +7.3 | 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% | 92% | +4.8 | 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% | 97% | −6.3 | 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 94% | 98% | −3.8 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% | 99% | −4.9 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 60% | 100% | −40.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 95% | 95% | −0.3 | 3–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 96% | 97% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% | 99% | −0.2 | 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 70% | 80% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16 |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 96% | 96% | −0.3 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 97% | 96% | +0.5 | 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 76% | 95% | −18.8 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 2–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 89% | 70% | +19.4 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 70% | 76% | −5.8 | 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 97% | 96% | +0.9 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% | 94% | −0.5 | 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #6/15 | #13/15 | – | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 64% | 59% | +5.7 | 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 60% | 80% | −20.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 | #1/9 | – | 0–12 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 · 195/55R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community generally rates the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its wet grip, comfort, quietness, durability/mileage and capable all-weather performance including snow and Alpine ski trips. It is frequently chosen over the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Pirelli Cinturato SF3, though some users report weaker aquaplaning as tread wears, road noise on rough roads, and premature edge wear or cracking on front tyres.
“Conti! Got the CC2 put on my brand new C class. Was not happy at all. They were loud and caused vibrations at 80kmh and 110-120kmh which were too noticeable to accept. Drove 3500km with them. Complained, dealer replaced them to ASC2 free of charge, and the car now drives like butter.”
“My first all-season tires (Continental AllSeasonContact2) Hi everyone, I finally had my all-season tires installed: Continental AllSeasonContact2 235/60 R18 103T. Compared to the factory-equipped Hankook summer tires (in Italy you don’t get all-season ones…) I have to say they’re noticeably quieter. I tested them on the roads of the Dolomites between Belluno and Bolzano, and they performed excellently in rainy/sleety conditions. Let’s hope they last at least 2 years. Read more”
“Continental Allseason Contact 2,uzura ciudată Anvelope Continental Allseason Contact 2, Dot late 2024, 3000 km rulaj. Presiune făcută conform datelor de pe stâlp, pe exteriorul anvelopelor fata(tracțiune fata) se vad bucăți rupte de cauciuc pe muchii. Cei care aveți allseason, sau v-ați întâlnit cu problema asta, este normal? Read more”
Based on 70 community posts
| Attribute | A · Kleber Quadraxer 3 | B · Continental AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 71 | 138 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 56 | 56 |
Kleber Quadraxer 3
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Narrow edge: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — better comfort, wet and efficiency. Where the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 87 vs 74 on comfort.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 91 vs 82 on wet.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 84 vs 77 on efficiency.
Kleber Quadraxer 3 won 9 of 9 shared dry braking tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 91 vs 82 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 85 vs 83 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 82 vs 81 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 87 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 84 vs 77 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology