tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 275 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S is ahead, 68–48

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire BHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 67 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +25
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 53 (est.)70
    Reviews found online3269

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 44

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +21
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 56 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4571

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 60 (est.)66
    Reviews found online4276

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.2 + 40% × 76 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    Kinergy 4S +22
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3367

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Noise

    Kinergy 4S +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)56
    Reviews found online37≈ 67 (est.)

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.7 = 55

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S +25
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 49 (est.)62
    Reviews found online1862

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 18.3 = 37

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 62 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +12
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Reviews found online5264
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–67
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Hankook Kinergy 4S
Relative Score 48 68
Dry 44 69
Wet 52 73
Snow 53 70
Comfort 45 67
Noise 55 60
Treadwear 37 62
Handling (owners) 52 64
Efficiency – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Kinergy 4S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HP71Kinergy 4SΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/CX5 ·1 upvote ·2026-10-04

“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”
r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/KiaEV6 ·2 upvotes ·2023-06-08

“Tire troubles - 19" Kumho Crugen HP71 I have a US spec 2022 Wind AWD with 23,000 miles on these Kumho tires. In my less than 9 months of ownership I've had two tires patched from slow leaks and I just had to have the foam lining removed from a tire since it separated from the inner tire wall and created massive vibrations in the steering wheel. With one of the patches my local shop pulled a stone that was less than 1/4" from the tread where it punctured the tire. Yes, it was pointy and sharp but also comically tiny. I'm I just extra special lucky or are others having issues with these tires? I really hope there are more options for our vehicles when it comes time to replace these.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy 4S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6367
Rim diameters16″ – 22″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9.9/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better dry, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 62 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 67 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 52 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 60 vs 55 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 62 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology